Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Honoring Malcolms Legacy: (The Release of his confessed killer sparks outrage)

On February 21, 1965 Malcolm X, son of two Garveyites and former Minister in Elijah Muhammad's Nation of Islam was gunned down in the Audubon Ballroom in front of a crowd of attendees at what would have been yet another one of his history making and galvanizing speeches. In attendance that day were his wife Betty and their daughters. Police later arrested three men, all members of the Nation of Islam, all of whom were found guilty. The first two Khalil Islam and Abdul Aziz would spend the rest of their lives pleading their innocence even after their jail sentences were over. The third man, Mr. Thomas Hagan however admitted that to authorities that he was one of the triggermen and although he has since repented of his past deeds many in the African American community are not so quick to forgive him for his actions. Last week Mr. Hagan was released from jail and so I sat down with Dr. Charles Johnson, history Professor at Howard University to get some insight on what the potential implications of Hagan's release could be as well as the historical significance of the murder of Malcolm X.


Q) Last week, Mr. Thomas Hagan, former member of the Nation of Islam and confessed murderer of Malcolm X walked out of the Lincoln Correctional Facility for all intents a purposes a free man. What were your initial thoughts upon learning this information and what was/is the historical significance of it?


A) I had no particular reaction to his release; it is not historically significant because Hagan is himself not a historic figure. The life he presumably took, that of Minister Malcolm X, was historic. If anything, we should use this time heal as a people and to reflect on the lessons Malcolm X was attempting to teach us and to build on his work on our behalf.

Q) History has taught us about the many covert and illegal operations carried out by the US government (i.e. COINTELPRO) to destroy Black people. What can we learn from the influence and social architecture of political movement's like the Black Muslim Movement (NOI) and Civil Rights Movement in order to be more united and aware of who and what is really dividing us?


A) Even within these two movements, which were separate and with different objectives, my contention is that as a consequence of having had our historical memory manipulated during enslavement and colonialism we lacked, and still lack, an understanding or appreciation of who we are as African people living in the United States. It is this fundamental crisis of identity among African Americans and Africans everywhere that permits us to be easily manipulated, our protest organizations to be infiltrated, and our heroes and heroines to be assassinated. True umoja (unity) of African people cannot occur until we see worth in and are motivated to organize around as well as to defend our Africanity, which must inform our values and beliefs as well as help to prioritize our decisions and actions. It is unrealistic to expect our people to embrace Africa without first knowing Africa – its history, culture, and enumerable contributions. So coming into a full understanding of the meaning of what it is to be African or an African descendant is a first step toward understanding who we are as a people not just here in the United States but on the continent and throughout the African Diaspora. You cannot know your enemies without first truly knowing yourself.

Q) There are some who may argue that Thomas Hagan has paid his debt to society and that he should be left alone to live out his days. Do you believe that he owes a separate debt to the Black community? Why or Why Not?


A) Minister Malcolm X's life cannot be monetized or quantified to extrapolate some sort of repayment, and even if it could be reified Hagan (in whatever form of currency we could conceive of) is incapable of paying for the life that he has taken. We would hope that he will seek to make some sort of contribution to the community, but that has no bearing on Minister Malcolm X's life, death, or legacy.

Q) As a martyr, Malcolm's influence upon generations of black men has been greater in death than it was in life. He is seen as the embodiment of Black manhood and responsibility. If he had not been killed, what influence do you think he would have had upon history?


A) My initial reaction to this question, as it was to a previous question when you mentioned "us", is who are you referring to when you say, "He is seen as the embodiment of Black manhood and responsibility"? Having taught our young people for several years and talked with people publicly and in private about Minister Malcolm X, I do not think "we" have the slightest idea who he was or what he represented, what he stood for, and what he ultimately died for. Minister Malcolm X could not be allowed to live. It was inevitable that he would be either discredited or assassinated – as all real threats to the United States government have been - because he took an uncompromising stand against white supremacy and western imperialism, and because he was a nationalist. He wanted to build a nation apart from the United States where African Americans could live with dignity and honor and true self-determination (kujichagulia); he advocated for revolution to bring this about.


Q) Mr. Hagan named Khalil Islam and Abdul Aziz as innocent men. Do you believe there to be a governmental conspiracy to protect the real murderers of Malcolm X? Why or why not?


A) This question is like the one concerning the meaning of Hagan's release or putative debt to the black community; they are all nonstarters to me because they will not retroactively change the course or meaning of history. Let's assume there was one and we could prove it, what would that change about what has happened? What outcome would we expect? For most people perception is reality, so even without proof many people have perceived that there was some sort of cover up and that perception has not translated into anything meaningful that I can discern. We know that the government will do whatever is in its power to retain power; this is a tough lesson history has taught us time and again: Assata, Mumia, Fred Hampton, Mark Clark, etc. We should be cognizant of that, store it as part of our historical memory, but not be distracted from the work among our people and in our communities that will improve our lives and circumstances.

Q) Seeing as you are a Professor at Howard University what lesson do you believe students of African American History should take from the life and death of Malcolm X?


A) Malcolm X's greatest legacy is love, an undying love for his people and an inexorable desire to see them living with dignity free from the negative influences of white supremacy and imperialism. He said many times that he did what he did out of love. He was so committed to our liberation effort that no personal price was too high. He risked his life, that of his family, and those who were close to him to bring about change in a positive direction for our benefit. He spoke truth to power in an unfaltering voice. His life was taken from him and from us in the midst of fighting for our right to human dignity.

Yet, the lyrics of the Last Poet's "Niggas are Scared of Revolution" were right: "Niggas loved to hear Malcolm rap, but that didn't love Malcolm." We did not share his commitment to his vision for our future, as much as we could see it, we were not prepared to pay as he did to attain it. His greatest lesson was not returned in kind, but from his example we should learn to love each other (abusua ye dom) and be committed to working for our collective best interests (ujima) no matter what the odds, no matter what the consequences just as he did.

Q)It's likely that Hagan may decide to write a book and/or go on Oprah to tell his side of the story. Would this be disrespectful to Malcolm's legacy or a step in the right direction to heal the past?


A) Hagan was an agent of white supremacy, nothing more. In this regard he is neither unique nor historic. In some ways, he was a victim. The victim of a society that created a set of oppressive circumstances that ended with historically tragic consequences. How then was Hagan an agent of white supremacy?
White supremacy is a myth, but it is a myth acted out. Because it is a construction of ideas and beliefs anyone can be a white supremacist or act as an agent of white supremacy. In fact, adherence to white supremacist ideas is often a coping tactic African Americans use to assuage the mental anguish of living in a white supremacist society. Doing so creates what Amos Wilson called "false consciousness." If we could imagine cellular DNA for a moment as a set of instructions that the cell refers to in order to carry out its functions and then draw an analogy to our historical memory as a sort of DNA or blueprint, then you can see very readily where by changing all or part of the DNA you can change the function of the cell. You can achieve the same result in humans through the manipulation of our historical memory – our set of instructions that tell us who we are and who we are in relationship to each other and the rest of the world; it identifies family and friends, allies, and enemies; it tells of us triumphs and tragedies and may even suggest how to achieve or avoid them. Our memories thus tempered with we are ready prey to all manner of propaganda and deception. This combined with repeated manifestations of white power and a willingness to use it against us or anyone deemed an enemy, real or perceived, we often attempt to adopt white supremacist ideology as a camouflage; some of us in our thinking behave like the chameleon situationally switching colors to blend into the social environment. Others reject our true identity out of hand, a consequence of decades of negative socialization towards things African that includes almost constant and perpetual psychological conditioning to devalue anything associated with Africanity. Our great hope is to avoid a confrontation with white supremacists (our ultimate fear is confrontation with white people) but in embracing white supremacist ideology we take on a pathological mode of thinking and behaving that is inherently antagonistic and deeply harmful. Living in such a society causes our people deep mental anguish and consequent psychological dysfunction, which is manifest in our decision-making, self-conception, self-negation, reference group identification, social anxieties, and values. Many of our patterns of substance abuse, suicide, and fratricide, are linked to lingering trauma from the past and neglect and abuse in the present. Thus, Hagan could have been any number of our people. Certainly, there were many others who feared Malcolm X or more appropriately who feared his ideas and beliefs and what, if carried to their logical conclusion, they would mean. Perhaps one day he will tell his side of the story and something meaningful will come out of it, but in the meantime we should not waste time fretting over what he might or might not do. We should continue to build on Malcolm X's work.

Q)Its been a couple generations since Malcolm's death... do you think the Black community will forgive him?


A) Again, I neither think that the Black community has a love affair with Malcolm X nor do I think Hagan should be treated as a historic figure; again, he was acting as an agent of white supremacy. Those in our community with the sense enough to love and appreciate brother Malcolm will govern themselves based on their particular values and morals as it relates to such matters, but my great hope is that rather than focusing on Hagan, we use this as an opportunity to teach about Brother Malcolm and to continue his important work.

Dr. Charles Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Howard University History Department who focuses on African Diaspora Studies with a focus on Twentieth Century Protest Movements. You can reach him at charles.johnson@zucille.com

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Black Marriage Crisis Part Two: Let's Talk About Sex

or some reason in today’s society people have forgotten about Black love. Fortunately President and First Lady Obama are keeping the image of a positive, successful Black marriage in the forefront of today’s media. However, to remove the stigma that has become attached to Black marriages, what needs to occur is a rethinking about how Black parents educate their children about love, sex and relationships.

One thing that I have found increasingly shocking as I have gotten older is the amount of neglect a topic such as sex receives in modern-day Black American households. Far too often young people like myself find ourselves without proper guidance and education about matters of the heart. Oftentimes parents leave the onus to the child or the school to educate children on sex and relationships and this, I believe is partly to blame for the high rates of both the unmarried and divorced in the Black community.

I believe that the responsibility should fall on parents to educate their children about their own beliefs about sex so that the young person is clear on the parents stance but also able to ask questions for the purpose of education. In my own teenage years many of the questions I had about intimacy were forced to be answered through osmosis, and although society has normalized this I do not believe it is the best method of education for young people.

In 2008 there was nearly a double-digit increase in all STD’s, except for gonorrhea according to Avert.Org, a non-profit HIV/AIDS charity. I wonder how many of these cases could have been prevented with simple education? I realized the importance of sexual education when I was a student at Marist High School, located in Bayonne, New Jersey. Being a Catholic school, the school supports a pro-abstinence policy which in and of itself does no harm in my view. However, being the optimist that I am, I believe that educated people will ultimately make the best decisions for themselves and for the broader society, at least in most instances.

As I go on some of my old high school friends Facebook profiles, I am in shock at how many of them are now parents or expecting a new child. Again I ask, how many of those pregnancies could have been prevented with simple education of the person? This writing is in no way intended to demean the teaching method of my alma mater’s teaching philosophy, I am just asking the question. In episode 507 of the popular Comedy Central series “South Park” the small, fictitious Colorado town is once again up in arms because the question of sexual education is being literally fought over by the parents, teachers and of course the children of the town. Ultimately it is decided that schools and the broader community should play a secondary role in the sexual education of the young people and I believe that this is what would be best for Black America.

As uncomfortable as it may be for some parents and children I believe that having candid, open conversations about sex and matters of the heart would lead to less unplanned pregnancies as well as the restoration of marriage as a cornerstone, normative institution in Black America, and not just a spectacle when successful.

Black Marriage Crisis Part Two: Let

or some reason in today’s society people have forgotten about Black love. Fortunately President and First Lady Obama are keeping the image of a positive, successful Black marriage in the forefront of today’s media. However, to remove the stigma that has become attached to Black marriages, what needs to occur is a rethinking about how Black parents educate their children about love, sex and relationships.

One thing that I have found increasingly shocking as I have gotten older is the amount of neglect a topic such as sex receives in modern-day Black American households. Far too often young people like myself find ourselves without proper guidance and education about matters of the heart. Oftentimes parents leave the onus to the child or the school to educate children on sex and relationships and this, I believe is partly to blame for the high rates of both the unmarried and divorced in the Black community.

I believe that the responsibility should fall on parents to educate their children about their own beliefs about sex so that the young person is clear on the parents stance but also able to ask questions for the purpose of education. In my own teenage years many of the questions I had about intimacy were forced to be answered through osmosis, and although society has normalized this I do not believe it is the best method of education for young people.

In 2008 there was nearly a double-digit increase in all STD’s, except for gonorrhea according to Avert.Org, a non-profit HIV/AIDS charity. I wonder how many of these cases could have been prevented with simple education? I realized the importance of sexual education when I was a student at Marist High School, located in Bayonne, New Jersey. Being a Catholic school, the school supports a pro-abstinence policy which in and of itself does no harm in my view. However, being the optimist that I am, I believe that educated people will ultimately make the best decisions for themselves and for the broader society, at least in most instances.

As I go on some of my old high school friends Facebook profiles, I am in shock at how many of them are now parents or expecting a new child. Again I ask, how many of those pregnancies could have been prevented with simple education of the person? This writing is in no way intended to demean the teaching method of my alma mater’s teaching philosophy, I am just asking the question. In episode 507 of the popular Comedy Central series “South Park” the small, fictitious Colorado town is once again up in arms because the question of sexual education is being literally fought over by the parents, teachers and of course the children of the town. Ultimately it is decided that schools and the broader community should play a secondary role in the sexual education of the young people and I believe that this is what would be best for Black America.

As uncomfortable as it may be for some parents and children I believe that having candid, open conversations about sex and matters of the heart would lead to less unplanned pregnancies as well as the restoration of marriage as a cornerstone, normative institution in Black America, and not just a spectacle when successful.

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Black Marriage Crisis: Part One The Assault on Black Love




How do we define ourselves? How do we define success? These are two essential questions that we must ask ourselves as Black people, especially when it comes to the realm of relationships and marriage. On December 22, 2009 my mother and I happened to watch ABC’s latest piece on Black male and female relationships and since that time this clip has been making the rounds on Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. The expose follows Nicole Marshond a beautiful sister from the state of Georgia who is the epitome of the modern day female professional. Ms. Marshond is a Prosecutor, drives a Mercedes Benz and even does some side work as an Atlanta Falcons cheerleader. Sadly at the time of this report, Ms. Marshond is unmarried with no foreseeable change in sight for herself or her circle of friends who are also featured in this broadcast. When Brother Cheo asked me to write a response to this story I jumped at the opportunity.

It should be no secret that there are more women (forget about race for a second) than men on the planet. Human genetics and social factors (like war) have made it so that women have a higher likelihood of being born and living longer, even across racial and ethnic lines. Most Black Americans are not under any illusion and realize that life, as a Black male in this country can be tough. Gangs, premature death and certainly prison are all social factors that Black men have to overcome if they live in inner city environments. Nobody can deny the grossly negative and devastating factors that face our people today but now I will attempt to flip the script and “change the game” on this conversation and hopefully if I am right maybe a few readers will fine Mr. Right.

This short news story has gained a lot of popularity recently because it cites a non-cited statistic stating that out of 100 Black men, 21% do not have a high school diploma, 17% do not have a job (never mind the fact that the nation as a whole is facing an economic recession and job loss at record rates) and that 8% of those between the ages of the 25 and 34 are incarcerated. That would leave only 54% of Black men eligible to be married. I will pause for a moment and note that not only was this statistics source not cited but that it also did not give any age ranges for any of the categories except for the one about incarceration.

There is an old saying that “figures don’t lie, but liars can figure” and that is what has been happening in our community when it comes to this issue. Oftentimes people cite statistics that are incomplete or misleading. Filmmaker Janks Morton’s work “What Black Men Think” documents how oftentimes age is not factored into many of the statistics that are shown with regards to Blacks and that it must be in order to understand the truth of the condition of the Black community. 21% of Black men don’t have a diploma, in which age brackets? On this the ABC news story is silent.

There is a propaganda campaign that exists to tear Black men and Black women away from one another and is manifested in much of the media that is being produced in modern America. I cannot however deny the fact that there are many wonderful women in America today who have trouble finding that special someone and even more who never get to walk down the isle. Even my own mother didn’t get married until she was well into her forties, to a man more than ten years younger than herself I might add. My father married my stepmother in 2002, the same year as my mothers wedding and despite my parents having children together this was both of their first time getting married. Why do so many sisters have difficulty getting married? ABC brought in Steve Harvey, author of the popular Act Like A Lady, Think Like A Man who actually brought up an interesting point about the requirements Black women have of potential mates. Mr. Harvey says: “If you are a corporate executive, does he have to be a corporate executive? If you make $150,000 a year, does he have to make the $150,000 a year or above?” I believe it is these stringent requirements that have lowered Black women’s prospects.

There is nothing wrong with having standards but in having a conversation with my own girlfriend Kristie George she had some choice words for her fellow Black women. “The problem is that a lot of other black women do not want to be women but define themselves as career women. I make more money than James does but I still cook for him and support James in what he does, not because I am old school but because I understand that a relationship needs more than just money in order to exist. Many of us need to stop allowing ourselves to be defined by our job titles and sometimes we need to just be people.” To Be Continued…